https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125518 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that iron ore fine should not be considered excisable goods produced but exempted under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant's argument that iron ore fine should not be treated as a separate product from iron ore was accepted, leading to a waiver of dues. The Tribunal decided to waive the pre-deposit of the balance amount of duty, penalty, and interest until the appeal's final disposal, providing relief to the appellant regarding payment and penalty issues related to the iron ore fine. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:35:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125518 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that iron ore fine should not be considered excisable goods produced but exempted under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant's argument that iron ore fine should not be treated as a separate product from iron ore was accepted, leading to a waiver of dues. The Tribunal decided to waive the pre-deposit of the balance amount of duty, penalty, and interest until the appeal's final disposal, providing relief to the appellant regarding payment and penalty issues related to the iron ore fine. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125518