https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125515 A prima facie case for stay was found where the disputed duty demand related to goods destroyed in a fire, and the appellant contended that the goods had remained in manufacture and had not attained marketable stage. The challenged order did not satisfactorily address that contention on a prima facie view. Given the destruction of the goods, immediate deposit would have caused unwarranted financial burden, while no real prejudice to revenue was shown at that stage. The duty demand was therefore waived pending disposal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:21:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125515 A prima facie case for stay was found where the disputed duty demand related to goods destroyed in a fire, and the appellant contended that the goods had remained in manufacture and had not attained marketable stage. The challenged order did not satisfactorily address that contention on a prima facie view. Given the destruction of the goods, immediate deposit would have caused unwarranted financial burden, while no real prejudice to revenue was shown at that stage. The duty demand was therefore waived pending disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125515