<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 719 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125510</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed applications for restoration of Excise Appeal Nos. 2644, 2645 &amp;amp; 2646 of 2008 due to lack of clarity on the dismissal date. The appeals were filed on 15-4-2009, but as no one appeared for the appellants during the hearing on 4-5-2009, the matter was adjourned. Since the record did not indicate the appeals were dismissed, the applications were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 719 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125510</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed applications for restoration of Excise Appeal Nos. 2644, 2645 &amp;amp; 2646 of 2008 due to lack of clarity on the dismissal date. The appeals were filed on 15-4-2009, but as no one appeared for the appellants during the hearing on 4-5-2009, the matter was adjourned. Since the record did not indicate the appeals were dismissed, the applications were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>