<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 718 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125508</link>
    <description>CPU cooler fan with heat sink was held classifiable under sub-heading 8473.30 rather than sub-heading 8414 59 10, as the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view and the later Board circular supported that classification. The departmental clarification, having withdrawn the earlier contrary position, was binding on the Revenue. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order remained undisturbed and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 718 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125508</link>
      <description>CPU cooler fan with heat sink was held classifiable under sub-heading 8473.30 rather than sub-heading 8414 59 10, as the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view and the later Board circular supported that classification. The departmental clarification, having withdrawn the earlier contrary position, was binding on the Revenue. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order remained undisturbed and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>