<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 711 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125501</link>
    <description>In a stay application arising from Revenue&#039;s challenge to the classification and valuation of imported aluminium composite plates, the Tribunal held that a detailed reappraisal of the classification issue was not warranted at the interim stage. The impugned order had given a reasoned prima facie finding that the goods were not aluminium structures or parts for use in structures, but were classifiable as aluminium plates of the relevant thickness. As Revenue failed to establish a sufficient prima facie case for suspension of that order, stay of operation was not justified and the stay petition was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 711 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125501</link>
      <description>In a stay application arising from Revenue&#039;s challenge to the classification and valuation of imported aluminium composite plates, the Tribunal held that a detailed reappraisal of the classification issue was not warranted at the interim stage. The impugned order had given a reasoned prima facie finding that the goods were not aluminium structures or parts for use in structures, but were classifiable as aluminium plates of the relevant thickness. As Revenue failed to establish a sufficient prima facie case for suspension of that order, stay of operation was not justified and the stay petition was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>