https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125491 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata, upheld the decision of the adjudicating Commissioner regarding the non-confiscation of impugned goods, citing the demand for differential duty and penalty imposition. The Tribunal deemed the decision appropriate as the goods were already released. The appeal on interest payment was dismissed, noting that the department can recover interest without specific orders. The appeal challenging the dropping of proceedings against noticees was also dismissed as no separate appeals were filed against them. en-us Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:43:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125491 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata, upheld the decision of the adjudicating Commissioner regarding the non-confiscation of impugned goods, citing the demand for differential duty and penalty imposition. The Tribunal deemed the decision appropriate as the goods were already released. The appeal on interest payment was dismissed, noting that the department can recover interest without specific orders. The appeal challenging the dropping of proceedings against noticees was also dismissed as no separate appeals were filed against them. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125491