<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 594 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125479</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI upheld the decision rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the demand for a specific amount could not be maintained against the respondents due to findings of suppression and withdrawal of the certificate. The Tribunal found that while suppression was established for one duty amount, it was not proven for the remaining period, leading to the dropping of the demand for that amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:44:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 594 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125479</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI upheld the decision rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the demand for a specific amount could not be maintained against the respondents due to findings of suppression and withdrawal of the certificate. The Tribunal found that while suppression was established for one duty amount, it was not proven for the remaining period, leading to the dropping of the demand for that amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>