<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 719 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of war materials imported under the guise of Heavy Melting Steel Scrap, rejecting penalties on the importer and Custom House Agent (C.H.A.) due to lack of evidence of their involvement in concealment. Despite doubts about inspection agency procedures and certificate authenticity, the Tribunal emphasized the responsibility of the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (D.G.F.T.) to address lapses. The judgment highlighted the importer&#039;s lack of knowledge about the materials and stressed the need for accountability in inspection processes. The department&#039;s appeals were rejected, and consequential relief was granted to the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 719 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of war materials imported under the guise of Heavy Melting Steel Scrap, rejecting penalties on the importer and Custom House Agent (C.H.A.) due to lack of evidence of their involvement in concealment. Despite doubts about inspection agency procedures and certificate authenticity, the Tribunal emphasized the responsibility of the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (D.G.F.T.) to address lapses. The judgment highlighted the importer&#039;s lack of knowledge about the materials and stressed the need for accountability in inspection processes. The department&#039;s appeals were rejected, and consequential relief was granted to the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>