<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 718 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125472</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The Tribunal found the Original Authority&#039;s order following its directions appropriate, while the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to address evidence and direction properly, leading to restoration of the Original Authority&#039;s order. The case involved duty demands, penalties for shortages of raw materials and excess finished goods, and confiscation of goods with a redemption fine imposed. The Tribunal directed re-examination of evidence by the Original Authority, emphasizing the importance of considering all evidence in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:07:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 718 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125472</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The Tribunal found the Original Authority&#039;s order following its directions appropriate, while the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to address evidence and direction properly, leading to restoration of the Original Authority&#039;s order. The case involved duty demands, penalties for shortages of raw materials and excess finished goods, and confiscation of goods with a redemption fine imposed. The Tribunal directed re-examination of evidence by the Original Authority, emphasizing the importance of considering all evidence in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>