<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 715 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125469</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai addressed issues concerning the re-determination of the assessable value of an imported car, confiscation for non-submission of the required Type Approval certificate, and the imposition of a penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal upheld the re-determined value based on investigations, questioned the confiscation due to the certificate issue, and did not extensively discuss the penalty. The decision directed the applicant to pay duty, provide a bank guarantee, and release the car provisionally, while dismissing the stay application and the early hearing application on the stay petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:46:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 715 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125469</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai addressed issues concerning the re-determination of the assessable value of an imported car, confiscation for non-submission of the required Type Approval certificate, and the imposition of a penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal upheld the re-determined value based on investigations, questioned the confiscation due to the certificate issue, and did not extensively discuss the penalty. The decision directed the applicant to pay duty, provide a bank guarantee, and release the car provisionally, while dismissing the stay application and the early hearing application on the stay petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>