<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 559 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125461</link>
    <description>A Section 11C notification exempted the duty of excise leviable on newsprint in reels for the period 1-3-1988 to 8-7-2004, which covered the disputed period from 1-8-2002 to 31-8-2003. Because the notification applied to the material period, the duty demand on newsprint in reels could not be sustained. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed and the demand was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 559 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125461</link>
      <description>A Section 11C notification exempted the duty of excise leviable on newsprint in reels for the period 1-3-1988 to 8-7-2004, which covered the disputed period from 1-8-2002 to 31-8-2003. Because the notification applied to the material period, the duty demand on newsprint in reels could not be sustained. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed and the demand was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>