<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 558 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, as well as the stay application and appeal. It held that once a Review Committee decides not to file an appeal, they become functus officio, and there is no legal provision to revisit their decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to established legal procedures and the finality of decisions made by competent authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 558 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, as well as the stay application and appeal. It held that once a Review Committee decides not to file an appeal, they become functus officio, and there is no legal provision to revisit their decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to established legal procedures and the finality of decisions made by competent authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>