https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125458 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Central Information Commissioner's order directing disclosure of marks obtained by the selected candidate and the applicant for a public post. It held that the marks do not constitute personal information exempt from disclosure under Section 8 of the Right to Information Act. The court emphasized the importance of transparency in the selection process for public posts, ruling that such information does not fall under a fiduciary relationship exempted from disclosure. en-us Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125458 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Central Information Commissioner's order directing disclosure of marks obtained by the selected candidate and the applicant for a public post. It held that the marks do not constitute personal information exempt from disclosure under Section 8 of the Right to Information Act. The court emphasized the importance of transparency in the selection process for public posts, ruling that such information does not fall under a fiduciary relationship exempted from disclosure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125458