<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 759 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders enhancing the declared value for silk fabric clearance. The Tribunal deemed the value initially declared by the importer as appropriate for duty payment, granting consequential relief. The Department failed to produce evidence justifying the value enhancement, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant. The judgment was pronounced on 6-8-2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 759 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders enhancing the declared value for silk fabric clearance. The Tribunal deemed the value initially declared by the importer as appropriate for duty payment, granting consequential relief. The Department failed to produce evidence justifying the value enhancement, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant. The judgment was pronounced on 6-8-2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>