https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125446 The Commission directed that the appellant be allowed inspection of the requested files and documents related to a former Commissioner of Central Excise, including vigilance case records, as the vigilance enquiry was closed. The Commission held that Section 8(1)(h) did not apply to completed enquiries, and Section 8(1)(g) was not applicable as similar information had been provided by the CBI. The appellant was granted the opportunity to take copies of the information on payment of the prescribed fee. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:26:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125446 The Commission directed that the appellant be allowed inspection of the requested files and documents related to a former Commissioner of Central Excise, including vigilance case records, as the vigilance enquiry was closed. The Commission held that Section 8(1)(h) did not apply to completed enquiries, and Section 8(1)(g) was not applicable as similar information had been provided by the CBI. The appellant was granted the opportunity to take copies of the information on payment of the prescribed fee. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125446