<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 698 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125437</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted pending disposal of the appeals because the applications raised common questions of law and fact and a prima facie review showed incomplete consideration of the clubbing of licences issued by the competent authorities. The record also indicated that the finding on alleged non-fulfilment of export obligation did not examine the nature of the exported goods or how the conditions of Notification No. 43/2002-Cus. were said to have been breached. In these circumstances, insisting on pre-deposit was considered likely to cause undue hardship, and waiver was found not to prejudice the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 698 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125437</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted pending disposal of the appeals because the applications raised common questions of law and fact and a prima facie review showed incomplete consideration of the clubbing of licences issued by the competent authorities. The record also indicated that the finding on alleged non-fulfilment of export obligation did not examine the nature of the exported goods or how the conditions of Notification No. 43/2002-Cus. were said to have been breached. In these circumstances, insisting on pre-deposit was considered likely to cause undue hardship, and waiver was found not to prejudice the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>