<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 638 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125432</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s request to deposit the required amount in monthly installments due to financial constraints, citing that no new grounds justified a modification of the original order. Despite the dismissal, the Tribunal extended the time period for depositing the amount by eight weeks, emphasizing that the initial order was based on the appellant&#039;s willingness to comply and that existing circumstances did not warrant a change in payment terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:55:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 638 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125432</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s request to deposit the required amount in monthly installments due to financial constraints, citing that no new grounds justified a modification of the original order. Despite the dismissal, the Tribunal extended the time period for depositing the amount by eight weeks, emphasizing that the initial order was based on the appellant&#039;s willingness to comply and that existing circumstances did not warrant a change in payment terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>