https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125430 The Tribunal refused exemption from duty based on previous decisions and interpretation of the entry in Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. The appellant's arguments were distinguished from Saberwal Surgical, leading to a denial of a blanket stay and waiver of pre-deposit. The differences between the products in question and those in previous cases were emphasized, with no waiver granted. The Tribunal found no prima facie case for stay or waiver of pre-deposit, requiring the duty amount to be deposited within 8 weeks. Compliance was scheduled for a specific date in 2009, with penalty and interest aspects stayed pending appeal. en-us Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:45:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125430 The Tribunal refused exemption from duty based on previous decisions and interpretation of the entry in Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. The appellant's arguments were distinguished from Saberwal Surgical, leading to a denial of a blanket stay and waiver of pre-deposit. The differences between the products in question and those in previous cases were emphasized, with no waiver granted. The Tribunal found no prima facie case for stay or waiver of pre-deposit, requiring the duty amount to be deposited within 8 weeks. Compliance was scheduled for a specific date in 2009, with penalty and interest aspects stayed pending appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125430