https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125416 The penalty in Appeal No. E/1852 of 2007 was reduced to Rs. 42,280/-, and Appeal No. E/1854 of 2007 was allowed. The judge found that the duty was paid before the show cause notice, and there was no evidence implicating the Director in the clearance without duty payment. The penalty on the Director was set aside due to immediate duty deposit upon detection and lack of evidence of involvement in the clearance without duty payment. en-us Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:10:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125416 The penalty in Appeal No. E/1852 of 2007 was reduced to Rs. 42,280/-, and Appeal No. E/1854 of 2007 was allowed. The judge found that the duty was paid before the show cause notice, and there was no evidence implicating the Director in the clearance without duty payment. The penalty on the Director was set aside due to immediate duty deposit upon detection and lack of evidence of involvement in the clearance without duty payment. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125416