<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 555 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125407</link>
    <description>Debit of duty in RG 23A Part II was treated as sufficient compliance with the pre-deposit requirement where the assessee was a Large Taxpayer Unit. Fresh cash deposit was held unnecessary, and rejection of the appeal for want of cash payment was not justified. The appeal had to be considered on merits, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision without insisting on any further deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 555 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125407</link>
      <description>Debit of duty in RG 23A Part II was treated as sufficient compliance with the pre-deposit requirement where the assessee was a Large Taxpayer Unit. Fresh cash deposit was held unnecessary, and rejection of the appeal for want of cash payment was not justified. The appeal had to be considered on merits, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision without insisting on any further deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>