<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 553 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the application for recalling the ex parte Final Order, acknowledging that the order resulted from the negligence of the previous counsel. Citing previous instances and legal principles, the Tribunal emphasized that litigants should not bear the consequences of their counsel&#039;s negligence. The Final Order dated 25-1-2007 was recalled, and the appeal was scheduled for a hearing on 26-3-2009, ensuring transparency and adherence to legal procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:38:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 553 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the application for recalling the ex parte Final Order, acknowledging that the order resulted from the negligence of the previous counsel. Citing previous instances and legal principles, the Tribunal emphasized that litigants should not bear the consequences of their counsel&#039;s negligence. The Final Order dated 25-1-2007 was recalled, and the appeal was scheduled for a hearing on 26-3-2009, ensuring transparency and adherence to legal procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>