<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 521 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125395</link>
    <description>Undisputed recovery of concealed foreign currency, coupled with an unaccepted explanation for its possession, established an attempt to smuggle the currency by concealment. On those facts, no mitigating circumstances were shown to justify interference with the penalty imposed under section 114 of the Customs Act, and the penalty was upheld without reduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:49:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 521 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125395</link>
      <description>Undisputed recovery of concealed foreign currency, coupled with an unaccepted explanation for its possession, established an attempt to smuggle the currency by concealment. On those facts, no mitigating circumstances were shown to justify interference with the penalty imposed under section 114 of the Customs Act, and the penalty was upheld without reduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>