<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 756 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125382</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking condonation of a 15-day delay in filing an appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order for a refund was dismissed by the Tribunal. The department&#039;s reliance on correspondence between Chennai and Ahmedabad Commissionerates regarding the acceptance of a Supreme Court judgment did not establish a valid cause of action for the appeal. The Tribunal found the appeal lacked merit as no review petition had been filed against the judgment, leading to the dismissal of both the appeal and the application for condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:03:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 756 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125382</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking condonation of a 15-day delay in filing an appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order for a refund was dismissed by the Tribunal. The department&#039;s reliance on correspondence between Chennai and Ahmedabad Commissionerates regarding the acceptance of a Supreme Court judgment did not establish a valid cause of action for the appeal. The Tribunal found the appeal lacked merit as no review petition had been filed against the judgment, leading to the dismissal of both the appeal and the application for condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>