<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 535 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the Appellant-Importer and fully allowed the appeal of the Appellant Clearing House Agent (CHA). The Tribunal reduced the Redemption Fine to Rs. 1.00 lakh and the Penalty to Rs. 50,000 for the importer due to financial strain and unintentional discrepancies. The penalty imposed on the CHA was revoked as there was no evidence linking them to undervaluation or misdeclaration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 535 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the Appellant-Importer and fully allowed the appeal of the Appellant Clearing House Agent (CHA). The Tribunal reduced the Redemption Fine to Rs. 1.00 lakh and the Penalty to Rs. 50,000 for the importer due to financial strain and unintentional discrepancies. The penalty imposed on the CHA was revoked as there was no evidence linking them to undervaluation or misdeclaration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>