https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125375 The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the CPIO's denial of information under the RTI Act. It was held that the exemptions under sections 8(1)(e) and 8(1)(j) were not applicable as the adjudication process for tax evasion cases does not involve a fiduciary relationship, and there is a public interest in disclosing such information. The judge directed the CPIO to provide the requested information to the appellant, emphasizing transparency and public accountability in such matters. en-us Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:15:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125375 The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the CPIO's denial of information under the RTI Act. It was held that the exemptions under sections 8(1)(e) and 8(1)(j) were not applicable as the adjudication process for tax evasion cases does not involve a fiduciary relationship, and there is a public interest in disclosing such information. The judge directed the CPIO to provide the requested information to the appellant, emphasizing transparency and public accountability in such matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125375