https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125374 Interim relief was granted where the Revenue showed a prima facie case that the unit's village was not specifically named in the annexure to Notification No. 56/2002-C.E. The unit had claimed refund under paragraph 3(b) for manufacture of D.G. sets, but the refund was rejected because the location was not shown in the notification. At the interim stage, the material produced did not displace that position, so operation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order was stayed. en-us Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:07:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125374 Interim relief was granted where the Revenue showed a prima facie case that the unit's village was not specifically named in the annexure to Notification No. 56/2002-C.E. The unit had claimed refund under paragraph 3(b) for manufacture of D.G. sets, but the refund was rejected because the location was not shown in the notification. At the interim stage, the material produced did not displace that position, so operation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order was stayed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125374