<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 694 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125362</link>
    <description>Refund of a pre-deposit made during investigation accrues only when the appellate authority grants relief, so the claim is not governed by the one-year limitation counted from the date of payment of duty. The Tribunal stated that Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act does not apply to refund of such a pre-deposit, and non-compliance with Rule 233-B of the Central Excise Rules cannot defeat the refund where the right to return arose only after a favourable appellate order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 694 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125362</link>
      <description>Refund of a pre-deposit made during investigation accrues only when the appellate authority grants relief, so the claim is not governed by the one-year limitation counted from the date of payment of duty. The Tribunal stated that Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act does not apply to refund of such a pre-deposit, and non-compliance with Rule 233-B of the Central Excise Rules cannot defeat the refund where the right to return arose only after a favourable appellate order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>