<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 683 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125350</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, set aside the lower Appellate Authority&#039;s decision and the Original Authority&#039;s order, remanding the case for a fresh assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering evidence on the correct payment of Excise Duty and directed the Original Authority to expedite proceedings due to the show cause notice issued in 2007. The appeals were disposed of to ensure a fair evaluation of evidence and adherence to Valuation Rules for Excise Duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:49:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 683 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125350</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, set aside the lower Appellate Authority&#039;s decision and the Original Authority&#039;s order, remanding the case for a fresh assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering evidence on the correct payment of Excise Duty and directed the Original Authority to expedite proceedings due to the show cause notice issued in 2007. The appeals were disposed of to ensure a fair evaluation of evidence and adherence to Valuation Rules for Excise Duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>