<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 549 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders due to the violation of natural justice principles, remanding the case for de novo adjudication. The appellant&#039;s right to access evidence and present a defense was emphasized, with a directive for a swift resolution within four months, stressing the importance of providing relevant materials and granting a fair opportunity for effective case presentation to uphold principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 549 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders due to the violation of natural justice principles, remanding the case for de novo adjudication. The appellant&#039;s right to access evidence and present a defense was emphasized, with a directive for a swift resolution within four months, stressing the importance of providing relevant materials and granting a fair opportunity for effective case presentation to uphold principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>