<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 544 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Rectification of Mistake (RoM) application challenging a Final Order, stating no error on the face of the record justified rectification. Emphasizing thorough consideration of evidence and legal principles, the Tribunal rejected the RoM for not pointing out any apparent mistake warranting rectification, clarifying its inapplicability to debatable legal or factual points. The judgment underscored the need for parties dissatisfied with findings to seek redress in a higher court rather than through the rectification process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:45:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 544 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Rectification of Mistake (RoM) application challenging a Final Order, stating no error on the face of the record justified rectification. Emphasizing thorough consideration of evidence and legal principles, the Tribunal rejected the RoM for not pointing out any apparent mistake warranting rectification, clarifying its inapplicability to debatable legal or factual points. The judgment underscored the need for parties dissatisfied with findings to seek redress in a higher court rather than through the rectification process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>