https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125333 The judgment concluded that the denial of information under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act regarding copies of Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Tiruchirapalli was not justified. It emphasized the public interest in transparency and accountability, directing the CPIO to provide the requested copies within 10 days. The court underscored the importance of disclosing quasi-judicial orders to promote transparency and noted the overriding effect of the RTI Act, 2005 on other laws concerning the disclosure of information. en-us Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125333 The judgment concluded that the denial of information under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act regarding copies of Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Tiruchirapalli was not justified. It emphasized the public interest in transparency and accountability, directing the CPIO to provide the requested copies within 10 days. The court underscored the importance of disclosing quasi-judicial orders to promote transparency and noted the overriding effect of the RTI Act, 2005 on other laws concerning the disclosure of information. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125333