https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125321 The Tribunal found no prima facie case in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU facing suspension of license due to duty evasion related to fraudulent exports and missing goods. Despite allegations of theft or replacement, the appellant failed to provide concrete evidence and conflicting statements raised doubts. The Tribunal emphasized the duty evasion amount and unauthorized clearance of goods, directing the appellant to deposit 50% of the duty within ten weeks. Compliance would lead to waiver of remaining duty and penalties, balancing financial obligations with the evasion allegations. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:56:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125321 The Tribunal found no prima facie case in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU facing suspension of license due to duty evasion related to fraudulent exports and missing goods. Despite allegations of theft or replacement, the appellant failed to provide concrete evidence and conflicting statements raised doubts. The Tribunal emphasized the duty evasion amount and unauthorized clearance of goods, directing the appellant to deposit 50% of the duty within ten weeks. Compliance would lead to waiver of remaining duty and penalties, balancing financial obligations with the evasion allegations. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125321