<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 524 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125320</link>
    <description>A reasonable bona fide belief, supported by a favourable Tribunal view on the tax treatment of free supplied items treated as quantity discount, barred invocation of the extended period of limitation. On that basis, the penalty also could not be sustained. The duty demand was therefore required to be examined only within the normal period, and the matter was remanded for re-quantification of duty within limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 524 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125320</link>
      <description>A reasonable bona fide belief, supported by a favourable Tribunal view on the tax treatment of free supplied items treated as quantity discount, barred invocation of the extended period of limitation. On that basis, the penalty also could not be sustained. The duty demand was therefore required to be examined only within the normal period, and the matter was remanded for re-quantification of duty within limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>