<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 522 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125318</link>
    <description>The tribunal waived the pre-deposit duty condition, allowing the appeal to proceed. The case involved remand proceedings for verifying a duty element claim from an insurance company. Despite the insurance company&#039;s failure to respond to requests for verification, the adjudicating authority proceeded to decide the matter. However, the advocate produced a letter obtained under the RTI Act from the insurance company, stating no duty element was part of their liability assessment. The tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter for re-adjudication based on the letter, ultimately disposing of the stay petition and appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:41:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 522 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125318</link>
      <description>The tribunal waived the pre-deposit duty condition, allowing the appeal to proceed. The case involved remand proceedings for verifying a duty element claim from an insurance company. Despite the insurance company&#039;s failure to respond to requests for verification, the adjudicating authority proceeded to decide the matter. However, the advocate produced a letter obtained under the RTI Act from the insurance company, stating no duty element was part of their liability assessment. The tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter for re-adjudication based on the letter, ultimately disposing of the stay petition and appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>