<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 924 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125296</link>
    <description>The Central Information Commission (CIC) directed the CPIO to provide the requested information to the appellant regarding the withdrawal of an appeal before the Delhi High Court, emphasizing that the queries fell within the RTI Act&#039;s provisions. The CIC criticized the application of Section 24(1) to withhold information from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and ordered the CPIO to provide the information without restrictions. Additionally, the CIC highlighted the importance of transparency in cases involving collusion among officers, criticized the conduct of the Appellate Authority, and advised officials to handle RTI applications impartially and in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:59:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 924 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125296</link>
      <description>The Central Information Commission (CIC) directed the CPIO to provide the requested information to the appellant regarding the withdrawal of an appeal before the Delhi High Court, emphasizing that the queries fell within the RTI Act&#039;s provisions. The CIC criticized the application of Section 24(1) to withhold information from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and ordered the CPIO to provide the information without restrictions. Additionally, the CIC highlighted the importance of transparency in cases involving collusion among officers, criticized the conduct of the Appellate Authority, and advised officials to handle RTI applications impartially and in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>