<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 542 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125276</link>
    <description>Connected customs matters were directed to be listed together for early hearing on the specified date, with notice to issue to remaining parties. Where an adjudication order concerns officers in their individual capacities, the Revenue must file separate appeals for each officer because the cause of action is individual-specific. The miscellaneous applications were allowed subject to these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 542 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125276</link>
      <description>Connected customs matters were directed to be listed together for early hearing on the specified date, with notice to issue to remaining parties. Where an adjudication order concerns officers in their individual capacities, the Revenue must file separate appeals for each officer because the cause of action is individual-specific. The miscellaneous applications were allowed subject to these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>