https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125267 Persistent non-compliance with an earlier Tribunal direction led CESTAT, Bangalore, to require the jurisdictional authorities to finalise the assessee's refund claim promptly. The Tribunal noted that the refund order had remained unimplemented for a substantial period and that the matter was still pending on audit clearance, reflecting inadequate promptness in compliance. The authorities were directed to finalise the claim within 15 days of receipt of the order and to refund the amount, with compliance to be reported on the fixed date. en-us Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:01:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125267 Persistent non-compliance with an earlier Tribunal direction led CESTAT, Bangalore, to require the jurisdictional authorities to finalise the assessee's refund claim promptly. The Tribunal noted that the refund order had remained unimplemented for a substantial period and that the matter was still pending on audit clearance, reflecting inadequate promptness in compliance. The authorities were directed to finalise the claim within 15 days of receipt of the order and to refund the amount, with compliance to be reported on the fixed date. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125267