https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125265 Interim relief on pre-deposit was considered appropriate where the appellant showed a prima facie record of duty having been paid on the intermediate product before the disputed period and resumed after adjudication. The disputed stoppage of payment for two months was treated as arising from confusion during pendency of the show cause proceedings, while the claim that the finished goods at the downstream plant had already suffered duty required verification. Because the dispute involved substantial revenue and the duty-payment position on record supported a prima facie case, pre-deposit of the disputed demand was dispensed with pending appeal. en-us Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:48:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125265 Interim relief on pre-deposit was considered appropriate where the appellant showed a prima facie record of duty having been paid on the intermediate product before the disputed period and resumed after adjudication. The disputed stoppage of payment for two months was treated as arising from confusion during pendency of the show cause proceedings, while the claim that the finished goods at the downstream plant had already suffered duty required verification. Because the dispute involved substantial revenue and the duty-payment position on record supported a prima facie case, pre-deposit of the disputed demand was dispensed with pending appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125265