https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125261 Forfeiture of security under Regulation 20 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 could not be sustained without compliance with Regulation 22's procedural safeguards, including a fair opportunity of hearing. The absence of natural justice and denial of hearing rendered the forfeiture order unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after granting due opportunity to the appellant. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:20:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125261 Forfeiture of security under Regulation 20 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 could not be sustained without compliance with Regulation 22's procedural safeguards, including a fair opportunity of hearing. The absence of natural justice and denial of hearing rendered the forfeiture order unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after granting due opportunity to the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125261