<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 515 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125257</link>
    <description>The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the entries in the PLA register constituted sufficient evidence of payment. The rejection of the refund claim by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board was overturned, and the case was remitted for a fresh consideration, with the possibility of requiring an indemnity bond from the appellant. The decision was made on 19-12-2008, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to present their case adequately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:56:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 515 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125257</link>
      <description>The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the entries in the PLA register constituted sufficient evidence of payment. The rejection of the refund claim by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board was overturned, and the case was remitted for a fresh consideration, with the possibility of requiring an indemnity bond from the appellant. The decision was made on 19-12-2008, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to present their case adequately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>