https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125252 The Revenue's appeal against the Order confirming a demand and penalties for shortages of 8000 LMs of MMF in a specific lot was rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal was dismissed due to inconsistencies between statements and physical evidence, with the clearance of goods allowed upon duty payment. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the decision to restrict the demand to the detected shortages, finding no evidence of clandestine removals beyond the specific lot in question. The rejection of the Revenue's appeal was finalized on 15-12-2008. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:29:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125252 The Revenue's appeal against the Order confirming a demand and penalties for shortages of 8000 LMs of MMF in a specific lot was rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal was dismissed due to inconsistencies between statements and physical evidence, with the clearance of goods allowed upon duty payment. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the decision to restrict the demand to the detected shortages, finding no evidence of clandestine removals beyond the specific lot in question. The rejection of the Revenue's appeal was finalized on 15-12-2008. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125252