<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 509 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125251</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, in a judgment delivered by Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri B.S.V. Murthy on 11-12-2008, allowed the appeal regarding the valuation of goods for Central Excise duty. The Tribunal upheld the appellants&#039; argument on the profit margin discrepancy, emphasizing the importance of correct valuation. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on the time bar limitation issue, stating that the show cause notice for the 1998 demand was indeed barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:24:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 509 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125251</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, in a judgment delivered by Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri B.S.V. Murthy on 11-12-2008, allowed the appeal regarding the valuation of goods for Central Excise duty. The Tribunal upheld the appellants&#039; argument on the profit margin discrepancy, emphasizing the importance of correct valuation. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on the time bar limitation issue, stating that the show cause notice for the 1998 demand was indeed barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>