<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 546 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on imported capital goods and unused raw materials but set aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty. It ruled against the confiscation and penalties imposed, finding no justification due to the denial of remission. The Tribunal instructed a review of the interest payment claim based on specific notifications, disposing of the appeal by upholding the duty demand and addressing each issue raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 546 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on imported capital goods and unused raw materials but set aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty. It ruled against the confiscation and penalties imposed, finding no justification due to the denial of remission. The Tribunal instructed a review of the interest payment claim based on specific notifications, disposing of the appeal by upholding the duty demand and addressing each issue raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>