<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 534 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125226</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, held that Pre Delivery Inspection (PDI) charges collected by dealers of the appellant from buyers of motor vehicles should not be included in the assessable value of vehicles cleared from the factory to dealers. The Tribunal relied on the decision in Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. CCE, Delhi, post the amendment to Section 4 on 1-7-2000. The department&#039;s appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s decision was dismissed as time-barred, resulting in the allowance of the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 17:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 534 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125226</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, held that Pre Delivery Inspection (PDI) charges collected by dealers of the appellant from buyers of motor vehicles should not be included in the assessable value of vehicles cleared from the factory to dealers. The Tribunal relied on the decision in Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. CCE, Delhi, post the amendment to Section 4 on 1-7-2000. The department&#039;s appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s decision was dismissed as time-barred, resulting in the allowance of the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>