<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 533 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125225</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with interest being payable on pre-deposited amounts as per the Tribunal&#039;s order. The Tribunal ruled that interest should be paid on the amounts deposited before the refund claim was made, starting from three months after the Tribunal&#039;s order in 2003. The Tribunal disagreed with the reasons for any delay in payment and held that interest was due on the deposits made by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 17:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 533 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125225</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with interest being payable on pre-deposited amounts as per the Tribunal&#039;s order. The Tribunal ruled that interest should be paid on the amounts deposited before the refund claim was made, starting from three months after the Tribunal&#039;s order in 2003. The Tribunal disagreed with the reasons for any delay in payment and held that interest was due on the deposits made by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>