<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 507 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125210</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was granted the remission of duty involving the 126 bags of sugar damaged during the fire accident, as verified by the central excise officers. The impugned order was modified to allow the remission of duty for the bags damaged in the fire, with the Tribunal finding that no negligence could be attributed to the appellant in the handling of the situation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 16:00:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 507 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125210</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was granted the remission of duty involving the 126 bags of sugar damaged during the fire accident, as verified by the central excise officers. The impugned order was modified to allow the remission of duty for the bags damaged in the fire, with the Tribunal finding that no negligence could be attributed to the appellant in the handling of the situation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>