<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 809 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants Cenvat credit on the welding table. The Tribunal determined that the welding table qualified as an &quot;input&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, as it was used in production activities. Consequently, the demand for duty was rejected, and no penalty was imposed, providing the appellants with relief. The decision emphasized interpreting the rules to ensure credit availability for goods used in manufacturing processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 809 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants Cenvat credit on the welding table. The Tribunal determined that the welding table qualified as an &quot;input&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, as it was used in production activities. Consequently, the demand for duty was rejected, and no penalty was imposed, providing the appellants with relief. The decision emphasized interpreting the rules to ensure credit availability for goods used in manufacturing processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>