<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 807 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125195</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for Cenvat credit. The decision was based on the verification of duty payment and consignee details by the Range Superintendent, along with adherence to Tribunal rulings in similar cases. The Tribunal emphasized the satisfactory verification process and upheld the assessee&#039;s right to the Cenvat credit despite the invoices being issued in the registered dealer&#039;s name.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:54:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 807 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125195</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for Cenvat credit. The decision was based on the verification of duty payment and consignee details by the Range Superintendent, along with adherence to Tribunal rulings in similar cases. The Tribunal emphasized the satisfactory verification process and upheld the assessee&#039;s right to the Cenvat credit despite the invoices being issued in the registered dealer&#039;s name.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>