<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 802 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, in a case concerning the recovery of erroneously refunded duty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, ruled in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of issuing a show cause notice for recovery of erroneous refunds, citing legal provisions and relevant precedents. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the appeals of the appellants, granting them consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:04:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 802 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, in a case concerning the recovery of erroneously refunded duty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, ruled in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of issuing a show cause notice for recovery of erroneous refunds, citing legal provisions and relevant precedents. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the appeals of the appellants, granting them consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>