<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 749 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the duty demand and setting aside the penalty. The refund application pending before the jurisdictional Commissioner was advised to be disposed of urgently. If decided in favor of the Appellants, they would need to pay the differential amount after adjusting with the demand amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 749 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the duty demand and setting aside the penalty. The refund application pending before the jurisdictional Commissioner was advised to be disposed of urgently. If decided in favor of the Appellants, they would need to pay the differential amount after adjusting with the demand amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>